Showing posts with label Health Law and Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Law and Policy. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Drug Shortages, not Just for Death Penalty, but also for Surgery

By their frivolous lawsuits and oppressive, anti-scientific regulations the lawyer has driven drugs for anesthesia and for the death penalty off the market.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

More Acne and More Suicide - Thank a Lawyer

Because acne is associated with a higher than expected rate of suicide, look forward to more acne and more suicide as Accutane is driven off the market by bogus lawsuits, and patients are taken off it in defensive medicine.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Now These Psychotic Killers Qualify for Help

And, here.

The lawyer has obstructed the treatment of psychotic people in order to generate lawyer jobs. There must be a hearing hiring three lawyers before involuntary treatment. A dangerous act must have taken place instead of the necessity of treatment.

Paranoid schizophrenics kill 2000 innocent people a year, many they never met.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Half the Health Budget is Waste - Thank the Lawyer

1) Defensive Medicine.

2) End of Life Care.

3) Gold Plated Accreditation Standards.

4) False Standards of Care Set by Courts in Medical Malpractice.

5) Antiscientific guidelines, policy manuals, mostly used by lawyers, as spears against doctors.

6) Excessive paper work, with a punitive, deterrence intent.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Driving 10 Miles Farther to Deliver a Baby

The lawyer controls the government, and is defunding clinical care. Then, they plunder it with bogus, weak litigation.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Lawyer Bullying Stops Simple Study of Checklist to Prevent Hospital Infections.

Here. A simple checklist applied in all hospitals may markedly reduce the hospital infection rate. These cost $3.6 bils, a year. They kill 28,000 people a year. Hospitals with 108 ICU's participated. They reported a drop of infections from 2.7 infections per 1000 catheterizations to zero. In the long term, they stayed low, at 1.4 compared to the baseline rate of 7.7. In just those participating hospitals, the checklist saved $175 millions, and prevented 1500 infection related deaths. OK, so lets extend the study to more hospitals.

No. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) of the US Department of Health and Human Services orders the hospitals to stop sending data to the study. These twits received an anonymous complaint. They determined that the Hopkins IRB had misclassified the study as exempt from human subject protections. After all, we are just testing numbers and not people. This is more a quality assurance review. That would be exempt. No. "If institutions are planning research activities examining the effectiveness of interventions to improve the quality of care, then the regulatory protections are important to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects."

I am interested in the data and the official reviews that allowed the opening of this office. It itself is ghoulish human experimentation by lawyers, unauthorized, without any evidence of safety, effectiveness, human subject protection, nor even informed consent.

Relatives of people who have died from a catheter borne blood infection may help these mass murdering lawyers in the OHRP understand better. These mass murderers should be put out of business and investigated, then charged with crimes against humanity.